
[ad_1]
I do not consider myself an experienced photographer who knows the nuances of composition, or an expert on lighting schemes in portrait photography. The reason for the 25x price difference between the Canon EF 16–35mm F2.8L III USM lens and the Yongnuo YN 50mm f/1.8 Canon EF lens eludes me. Therefore, I am writing not for specialists who will find errors and inaccuracies, but for ordinary amateur photographers.
Once I read an article about a way to photograph objects in complete darkness at a slow shutter speed with a flashlight. The technique is called “Light brush” and is a variant of the “Light graphics” technique (for example, when a person with a flashlight runs in front of the camera at night and draws some kind of pattern).

And when using the light brush method, on the contrary, an object is photographed, which is illuminated from different sides by a flashlight.
What are the advantages of this method:
1. When shooting subjects, there is no need for lighting equipment. Enough, for example, a cell phone flashlight.
2. You can get the effect of “inner radiance” of the subject if you do not illuminate the background with the same intensity as the subject.
3. Photos are unusual because you can highlight one side more than the other, completely get rid of any shadow, try lighting with different colors, etc.
No cons whatsoever:
1. You need a tripod or a surface on which the camera will be placed. Since the shutter can be opened and closed in the dark, there is no need for a remote control for cameras. You can not be afraid to blur the picture by pressing.
2. Only stationary objects can be photographed in this way. A portrait of a person, I think, can be done, but before that, he needs to be immobilized in some way. Of the humane, only a photograph of a sleeping person comes to my mind. Well, or, as portraits used to be made, attaching the head and body to a special mechanism.

And one feature — there is no way to know in advance how the frame will turn out, whether there will be enough light for the necessary illumination of the matrix, what kind of glare from shiny surfaces will be. But with a little experience, after a few photos it becomes clear how to cover what exactly and for how long.
In general, I had a tripod, a Nikon D7000 camera (they don’t make them anymore), a cheap Chinese souvenir flashlight and time to try it.
It was the middle of the day, the sun was shining, so I decided that it made sense to practice in the bathroom, put things on the shelf, adjusted the focal length, set the ISO to the minimum 100 units, set the shutter speed dial to 30 seconds, twisted the aperture to the maximum value of F / 29, turned off the light, opened the shutter of the camera, turned on the flashlight and began to drive the flashlight beam over the composition.
Then the meaning of the name of the technique “Light brush” came to me — it’s like you are using a brush, only instead of paint — a light beam, you draw over the composition, carefully covering it with light, trying not to miss anything.
The first experience turned out like this (about the construction of the composition, I refer to the beginning. The author is not a photographer, the author is the author):

The following features are visible: on the wall, the shadow from the bottle, which was reflected from the table mirror, the tiles glare, the flashlight was motionless for some time and illuminated the composition unevenly.
I try a second time with the same settings.

It turned out more uniform lighting, but the glare (the glass wall of the shower cabin is still glare on the left) still remains. I understand for myself that if there are glare surfaces, then it is better to join several photos taken from the same place and combine the result in the editor to remove very bright glare.
In general, I liked it, it was decided to continue, my wife was sent to the store to buy the components of a beautiful still life, and I sat down to wait for darkness.
Finally it got dark and the laboratory for making masterpieces moved to the kitchen.
An attempt was immediately made to create a still life composition in the style of Arcimboldo. It didn’t work out, so in the end the fruits were simply folded into a dish, for the entourage I added accessories and a glass of tincture.
I didn’t change anything in the camera settings. The first option turned out like this:

I noticed the following jambs: as before, it is not possible to evenly illuminate the composition, it is better to turn the mirror with the magnifying side away from the photo.
The second option went straight to the trash.

However, like the third. Here, in general, even the trace from the flashlight got into the reflection of the mirror.

Before making the next version, I still had to first think about what movements I would cover the composition with and practice several times. I also rearranged the components of the composition. It turned out like this:

I liked this option. For a change, I decided to add a light source and hid the iPhone with the flashlight turned on under the fruit plate. As a result, clearly overexposed the right side to the detriment of the left.

In the end, I really liked this technique. It turns out beautifully, unusually and does not require any additional costs or long preparation. Plus, you can still abuse it a little during production, because a full bottle looks completely different from a half-empty one.
[ad_2]