
[ad_1]

Initial data: you plan to do photography, set aside a certain amount of money to buy equipment, and … and fell into a stupor. What to buy and what to invest in more? An expensive lens and a very simple carcass? Dear carcass and some kind of lens for leftovers? Or maybe try to find 50/50? The question is important.
Investing in high-quality optics will play into your hands more than once. We understand why.
Size matters
Let’s say you chose the option with an expensive carcass and a cheap “for change” lens. We did a couple of shoots, filmed something, but the result, most likely, caused suppressed feelings. And then complaints began: to manufacturers, courses, a camera (to myself and skills, of course, in the last place). And there should be no complaints at all in this situation, you yourself chose to invest in an expensive camera, saving on a good lens.
It is foolish to expect outstanding image quality, noble midtones and high image sharpness from a five thousand zoom lens.
Yes, whale optics can be a good transitional option to start with, but only temporary. Picking up a premium fix, you will feel the difference from the very first frames, even if you are just starting your journey in photography and collecting a park of optics. If we are talking about updating the kit for a person already filming, then there is nothing to say. There is a huge difference between a modest lens and a premium one! The case when size matters.

Camera vs lens. What and how affects the picture?
If you closely study the chronology of updates from major players in the photography market, you will notice that new lens models come out much less frequently than cameras. In the 21st century, optics production technology is so advanced that it progresses slowly: most of the models already presented give an incredible picture. Getting old to be updated in the new format, they will be long. Many masters shoot with the same lenses for decades.
A lens is a one-time investment for many years.
In turn, the cameras — yes! The lineup is updated every year, manufacturers present improved carcasses with new features and improvements. But these are just bells and whistles that have a secondary effect on the picture. And makes her lens. Shooting in 4K, long bursts, wi-fi connectivity to a smartphone and so on and so forth seems exciting, but rarely comes into play unless you have a specific request for these options. For example, shooting a video for a blog or multi-part sports shooting.
The lens will matter in all respects and in any shooting.


The camera will affect color reproduction, depth, autofocus speed (such as the number of focus points), and overall control over image acquisition. The lens, on the other hand, makes the picture and will have more influence on accuracy, pattern, colors, depth of field and bokeh quality. Of course, the sharpness of the image depends on the number of megapixels and the size of the matrix in the camera, but if the lens is not “sharp” enough, then you will not fully benefit from such a resolution of the carcass.
The essence always remains the same: there is a lens through which light passes, and the matrix itself (film) where it enters. A kind of preliminary version of the future picture.
Any bells and whistles like frames per second, noise reduction, phone control, etc. — only the variability of the approach and work with this light passing through the lens.
The essence remains the same. And if so, then with the arrangement and seriousness, first of all, you need to approach it, to the essence.
From my own experience
My last few cameras have varied greatly in sensor size and resolution. Yes, now it is FF, but before that there was a crop, and even earlier — it’s not a shame to speak, a very modest device. The cards fell so that almost from the very first carcass I had 85/1.2. Very fast and premium lens. And what a hefty one! The years went by, and over time, shooting with several different ones, one of which was a whale zoom, I increasingly felt the difference in the picture between them. Yes, even on a strong crop. Having moved to a more serious camera, I felt the difference more and more: take my word for it, I didn’t even want to use other lenses when I saw the results from L‑ki after shooting. By switching to FF, I completely got rid of modest representatives in my arsenal. I just don’t get the same from them that I get from serious optics. Why then?
And I don’t even think about parting with several L‑s already. These lenses are quite old, but they still do their job perfectly. Like the old Mercedes-Benz and the new Lada 2021, where the old Mercedes is still a Mercedes, a luxury car. A clear example of how carcasses can change, even if very rarely, based on the financial situation, needs and development of technology, and the lens will constantly produce a strong picture on what is, and continue to produce it on a stronger technique. Even after decades.

On the left is the premium Sigma 50mm Art — on the right is the democratic Nikon 35mm 1.8

On the left is the premium Sigma 50mm Art — on the right is the democratic Nikon 35mm 1.8

On the left is the premium Sigma 50mm Art — on the right is the democratic Nikon 35mm 1.8
Reverse personal example! Once I was lucky enough to buy a German Voigtlander Bessa for an indecently modest amount. Premium rangefinder of Leica level. But there was not enough money for the same premium optics from Voigtlander itself or from Leica (they have one mount). I took in the appendage the simple “Jupiter” of the Soviet era. And after a while, another modest lens, pinning hopes on it. It didn’t help the case. The carcass, maybe, is premium, it works out the shutter speed, it lies in the hand, the exposure meter is of high quality — but cheap lenses do not give out a high-quality picture. The longer I put off buying good optics on Bess, the longer it just lies, because I just don’t want to shoot with existing lenses.
Is there an ideal scheme?
Let’s go back to the beginning: are you putting together a starter kit and trying to figure out how to allocate finances? There is no perfect answer here as it all depends on a lot of factors including the amount, your shooting style and what you will be shooting.
But I will give some general tips on how to put together a good kit, even for a modest amount, and still not miscalculate.
- First and most obvious: you need to see how different lenses perform in order to understand which one to take. Even good optics have a large price range.
- Personal advice: when choosing between several lenses, bet on fixes. 18/35/50/85 mm. Just because. Zoom lenses are by no means bad, but practice shows that fixes give a better picture.
You can also see examples. My advice is to go to Flickr and search for photos by the key combination “your carcass + the lens you are looking for.” There will definitely be photos, there are a lot of users on the service. See how the lens will draw exactly on your camera model, how it will show itself, what kind of picture it gives to other people.
— You can look for photo equipment rental companies in your city and take the lens of interest to shoot for a couple of days. Most likely, it will not cost space money, and you will understand how you shoot for the chosen model.
- In the end, if all the previous points have been sorted out, but a financial question arises, then look for a lens in the secondary market. Ad sites, VKontakte products and photo forums will come to the rescue. The prices will be lower. When buying, you can agree on a test day to check the equipment. Or check the working out of all options and the cleanliness of the lenses inside on the spot.
It is important to remember that carcasses are only consumables that become morally and physically obsolete, break down, wear out and be replaced sooner or later. The lens is the main investment. In order for your camera to work with full efficiency, sooner or later you will have to fork out for serious optics. A high-quality and expensive lens will give excellent results on both amateur and professional carcasses. Only with good optics will you get the most out of your camera.
[ad_2]